TRIPARTITE PARLEY FALTERS, AGAIN, AS CAPRIVIANS WANT REFERENDUM

November 30 2011

PRESS RELEASE

 

TRIPARTITE PARLEY FALTERS, AGAIN, AS CAPRIVIANS WANT REFERENDUM

 

The close to 1 000 Namibian refugees in exile in neighboring Botswana have rejected and brushed aside promises of peace and personal safety and security as well as socioeconomic welfare in their native Caprivi Region once they agree to a tripartite drive on “voluntary repatriation” to Namibia.

 

In their submission [see attached or visit www.namrights.org.na] addressed to the Tripartite Commission, consisting of the Governments of Botswana and Namibia as well as UNHCR, the UN’s refugee agency, the refugees, inter alia, said:

 

“With due respect, determination and courage the Caprivians in exile would like to inform the Government of Namibia which is ruling the Caprivi by force, the Government of Botswana, the UNHCR office in Botswana representing the United Nations, and the international Community, that we are not in Botswana by mistake or chance, but to liberate our motherland Caprivi [sic!]”.

 

The exiles also explained that previous meetings held during the last 13 years, with the said Commission and others, whose sole agenda has been the exiles’ voluntary repatriation to Namibia had proved futile because the said meetings have failed to address the political “crisis” on the ground in their native Eastern Caprivi Zipfel.

 

As an example of the said crisis on the ground, the submission makes reference to a whole range of human rights violations and shortcomings, including prolonged detention without trial, endless trial of “our fathers and cousins”, discovery of mass graves, torture, cold-blooded murder, the presence of Namibian security forces in villages, political prisoners and the banning of the United Democratic Party (UDP) as well as “cutting and adding” of parts of the Caprivi Region to Namibia’s Kavango Region.

 

“Endless trial” is reference to the ongoing marathon Caprivi High Treason Trial that has been running since October 23 2003. Since that date, the now only slightly more than 110 of the originally close to 140 ethnic Caprivian males are facing more than 270 high treason charges per capita. At least 21 of them have since died from various “natural” causes while in Namibian Police custody.

 

“Tripartite meetings aimed to GO and SEE, COME and Tell mission and Voluntary yield no tangible result to this political crisis and therefore we shall be reluctant in the future to attend such organised meetings. However, we shall remain open and invite any approach which can lead to permanent solution [to the Caprivi issue]”, the submission also reads.

 

As a precondition for their repatriation to Namibia, the refugees have issued six demands, which include a presumably UN-supervised South Sudan-style referendum for Caprivi, the unbanning of UDP and dialog between the Namibian Government and exiled Caprivi separatist leader and UDP President, Albert Mishake Muyongo.

 

More than 5 000 ethnic Caprivians and Khoisan (i.e. “Bushman”) people fled Namibia following widespread human rights violations that ensued in the aftermath of a daring separatist armed attack, which took place in Caprivi in the early hours of August 2 1999.  Namibian military and state security forces perpetrated the atrocities, which included summary executions, torture, enforced disappearances and massive deprivation of personal liberties. Most of these excesses are well documented and widely publicized around the world.

 

The protruding Eastern Caprivi Zipfel[1] only became loosely associated with German South West Africa (now Namibia) by accident following the Second Berlin Conference in 1890 during which the Zipfel became a Germany possession after the British exchanged it for the islands of Heligoland (North Sea) and Zanzibar (Indian Ocean) as part of the Heligoland-Zanzibar Treaty[2] concluded on July 1 1890. After World War I, Germany was stripped of all its colonial possessions as stated in the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 and Eastern Caprivi Zipfel remained under South African control. In 1920, South West Africa (now Namibia) was placed under the mandate of the League of Nations, while Eastern Caprivi Zipfel remained under direct South Africa (then a British colony) rule but as a separate entity.

 

Before Zambian independence in 1964, then Zambian Prime Minister Kenneth Kaunda and the Litunga (i.e. King) of Barotseland (BaLoziland), Sir Mwanawina Lewanika, signed an agreement incorporating the autonomous Barotseland Kingdom into Zambia without the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel.

 

Eastern Caprivi Zipfel was given its own Legislative Council in 1972, which could make decisions concerning its development and had its own national anthem and emblem. Nevertheless, a Commissioner-General administered the Zipfel directly from Pretoria in South Africa.

 

Moreover, until 1999, certain laws specific to South West Africa and subsequently Namibia were not applicable to the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel. The Application of Laws to the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel Act 1999 (Act 10 of 1999) [see attached or visit: www.namrights.org.na] was promulgated only on June 24 1999, extending the laws of Namibia to the Eastern Caprivi Strip as the Zipfel is also known.

 

In case of additional information, please call, e-mail or text: Steven Mvula or Phil ya Nangoloh at Tel: +264 61 253 447, +264 61 236 183 or +264 811 406 888 (office hours) or Mobiles: +264 811 299 886 (Phil) and or +264 812 912 948 (Steven) or E-mail: nshr@nshr.org.na or nshr@iafrica.com.na or visit us at: Liberty Center, 116 John Meinert Street, Windhoek-West, Windhoek or visit our website at: www. namrights.org.na

 

[1]http://m.vpike.com/?c=wa&UF=-2580814&UN=-3552358&DG=ADM1

 

[2]http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/606_Anglo-German%20Treaty_110.pdf

 

Source:

 

NamRights.org.na

http://www.nshr.org.na/index.php?module=News&func=display&sid=1722

3 Responses to 'TRIPARTITE PARLEY FALTERS, AGAIN, AS CAPRIVIANS WANT REFERENDUM'

  1. emaho says:

    I commend NAMRIGHT under Phil ya Nangoloh, by telling it the way it should be – a Referendum for Caprivi Strip Case in order to reach a more lasting resolution for people of Caprivi Strip. We hope the world is listening, especially the international community through the United Nations (UN), to act now before it’s too late.

  2. Edwin Samati says:

    Yes, if it can happen anywhere in the world, it happen in Caprivi Strip. Time is running out. The issue must be solved the gentlemen’s way.. Referendum is the best.

    • eustace says:

      Beautifully said countryman; the United Nation’s organized “Referendum” should be applied in the Caprivi Strip Case, to enforce the utility of such diplomatic and sound mechanism. This internationally accepted diplomatic and peaceful mechanism should especially be used in cases like this where Caprivian people are armed with their voices against a regime armed with machine guns, and with such brute force to wipe out all Caprivians. Rightly so, Caprivians have every right under the United Nations Universal Declaration for human rights, to self-determination and independence; so it’s about time such protections not humanitarian aid alone be applied to resolve this case once and for all. Enough is enough!

Leave a Reply